It’s very clear that film is the reigning gold standard which all the digital formats are attached to. Film has the ability to deliver a special character that has an outstanding flaw. It produces characters that digital may not be able to deliver. However, despite film reigning, there are occurrences that digital beats film in its own game. Filmmaking is quite extensive. It requires an individual to possess the necessary tools that will be utilized so as to have a magnificent end product. The industry expects one to have a filmmaking software like Greenslate. One should also have all the gadgets and applications that are needed in filmmaking. Let’s take a look at the various examples where digital is more prominent compared to film.
All the producers and filmmakers that practiced their careers during the digital revolution were very lucky. They fully took the advantage of the low-light capabilities that the digital cameras offered. The digital cameras did a fantastic job. Professionals hailed the digital cameras. They could do shooting at higher settings. They delivered very clean results.
Professionals note that there is no film that can be equivalent to digital cameras. Films stocks can’t allow filmmakers to shoot without lights. On the same, they can’t guarantee noise-free results. Undoubtedly, all the filmmakers that wish to work with a limited amount of light will go for digital formats. The Filmstock is too demanding and hectic to work with.
The Turnaround Time
Some people have assumed there is no change in time when it comes to processing digital dailies. In some production institutions, they prefer to have an editor who is stationed on set. Their main job is to create assembly pauses in the middle of the scenes while the rest of the team is still shooting. This certainty that is attached to digital is much advantageous compared to film. In some instances, when using film to shoot, it’s more time-consuming. It takes filmmakers more days and weeks to do the processing. Unless the scanning is completed, editing can’t be conducted. Also, if there are any errors in the footage, the producers and the filmmakers will have to schedule a day for rectifying the hitches.
Time on Set and Cost
Chances are high that even if a filmmaker has never shot on film, they’ll be able to know the cost that is attached with following the path. Film cameras are very cheap to purchase or even rent. However, processing and film stocks are still costly and very prohibitive for all low-budget producers.
Many producers prefer the digital format because it permits them to have lengthy record times. Also, this is a point that all digital shooters that have no absolute film experience take for granted. Shooters with enough experience noted that the ability to record generates more creative possibilities. Despite the convincing points above about digital, film still remains to be the most outstanding format that one can use. Again, one can’t deny that digital trumps on film in various fields.